The saga continues
Rusty's Response: "Regarding the stake relationship specialist, I'll propose it at our Stake High Council meeting tonight. :) Hey, you know we've put in an application for a singles branch, right?
Hopefully having a singles unit in Brooklyn will attract the singles from Manhattan who would otherwise move to Brooklyn except that Manhattan has the singles wards. It'll be interesting."
My follow-up:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
* 'Facetiously' as in amusing, humorous, light-hearted--all very good, the best approach for open dialogue.
** 'Similarly' inasmuch as the response began with similarly-humored remark; followed up, however, with a very sincere proposal of an encouraging development, the institution of a singles branch.
Hopefully having a singles unit in Brooklyn will attract the singles from Manhattan who would otherwise move to Brooklyn except that Manhattan has the singles wards. It'll be interesting."
My follow-up:
Actually, I think that it is interesting that in response to my facetiously-toned* comment that we should have a specialist to assist in helping people to get together, your similarly-toned** solution was the creation of a singles branch.
I attended singles wards in Manhattan for six years, yet, I never felt like they served as a solution. It's interesting because the Church Handbook of Instructions 1 instructs that most singles are best served as members of conventional wards and branches and only encourages the creation of a singles unit in exceptional cases (I read it when I was an Executive Secretary). Anyway, it's interesting. Lots of people think that singles wards are the answer to getting people together. In the city, there is so little relaxed interaction, and singles wards perpetuate that intensity. On the other hand, family wards permit individuals to interact in a secure atmosphere, learning the gospel from those with varied experiences and backgrounds. It rounds out the individual's humanity. We can form relationships that substitute for the family relationships most of us lack in this potentially very isolating place.
I really enjoyed my time in the singles wards and I think they serve plenty of good. As well, I think it's good to have a few other tricks up our sleeve.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
* 'Facetiously' as in amusing, humorous, light-hearted--all very good, the best approach for open dialogue.
** 'Similarly' inasmuch as the response began with similarly-humored remark; followed up, however, with a very sincere proposal of an encouraging development, the institution of a singles branch.
Comments